Albion teacher-contract negotiations were at impasse and had been referred for state mediation, according to a labor-relations presentation recorded in the district’s September 14 board summary. The record describes the district’s account of the talks; it does not establish a settlement or the present status of mediation. Karl Kristoff, an Orleans/Niagara BOCES labor-relations specialist, told the board that the Albion Teachers’ Association declared impasse on June 24, after the sides disagreed about the order in which to address remaining issues. A mediator had been appointed, he said, but no next negotiating sessions were scheduled at the time of the presentation. Kristoff said negotiating teams reached a tentative agreement on November 26, 2025, and association members rejected it on December 11. He explained that the proposed terms never took effect because the agreement was not ratified. That distinction matters for families and taxpayers: the rejected proposal is not an adopted pay or scheduling change. The summary attributes to Kristoff a five-year salary estimate of 22.1 percent, or $2,742,032, for the tentative agreement and 33.6 percent, or $4,181,804, for an April 2026 association proposal. Those are presented as calculations across the same five-year period, not annual raises or increases in every teacher’s paycheck. The summary says the tentative-agreement estimate covers salary-schedule movement and a professional step without associated cost items. The presentation identified compensation, workday time and a retirement benefit among the unresolved issues, along with sick-leave verification, sick-bank committee representation, enrollment of teachers’ nonresident children and extracurricular schedules. These descriptions come from the presentation recorded by the district. This packet contains no independent association statement, bargaining proposal or tentative-agreement text with which to test that characterization. Kristoff told the board that the expired agreement’s terms, including salary-step movement and benefits, continued while a successor agreement was negotiated, and that instruction, programs and daily operations continued without interruption. This reports his September explanation; it is not independent verification of legal rights or a guarantee about later developments. The district’s summary describes mediation as the next step, followed by fact-finding if mediation fails. No later outcome is supplied by the September record. Sources: [09-14-26 BOARD SUMMARY](https://files-backend.assets.thrillshare.com/documents/asset/uploaded_file/2526/Acsd/644d3953-bd47-42fa-a9ae-fc43391529d6/09-14-26-BOARD-SUMMARY.pdf?disposition=inline)